«There have been countries that have passed fake news laws, and they have abused them as you would expect,» he said. Now, Facebook files have reignited the privacy debate. The Senate Trade Committee held its first privacy hearing this year in September. Committee Chair Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Senior Member Roger Wicker (R-MS) both reiterated their interest in working together on comprehensive legislation. At that hearing, senators and case witnesses publicly softened their differences on the contentious issue of private prosecutions. If Congress passes big-tech legislation, the FTC will play a key role in enforcing it. And even if we don`t see new legislation next year, Meta won`t necessarily be out of the woods. Lawmakers have also used recent hearings on Meta to rail in favor of updating privacy laws. In addition to the agency`s lawsuit, Khan said last month that the FTC was considering drafting new rules that would further regulate how U.S.

companies can use data and algorithms. The efforts could lead to «market-wide requirements» targeting «harms that may result from commercial surveillance and other data practices,» Khan said in a letter to Blumenthal. This could deal another potential blow to Meta`s business model. However, when it came to difficult negotiations, the original promise faded. While there were encouraging overlaps in key legislation from Senate Commerce Committee leaders, the bipartisan agreement stalled. Among the ideological red lines that have frozen progress is whether a federal law should partially or completely exclude state privacy laws and whether to allow lawsuits by individuals for privacy violations. The Facebook Papers revelations have led to a flood of bills on Capitol Hill to address data use, children`s online safety and malicious content. The most effective step Congress can take is to pass comprehensive privacy laws to counter the explosion of digital information not covered by existing narrower privacy laws. The 25-year-old law prevents tech companies from being held accountable for the content users post on their platforms. For years, big tech companies have relied on the law to avoid being blamed for some of the most controversial content on their platforms and used it to dismiss lawsuits over news, videos, and other user-generated content. «The new Facebook/meta rule starts tomorrow where they can use your photos.

Remember, the deadline is today! This could be used in lawsuits against you. Everything you have posted will be published today, even the posts that have been deleted. It costs nothing to just copy and publish better than to regret later,» the warning message begins. «Where Section 230 really makes a difference is things like defamation suits,» Kosseff said. «But that`s not really what`s fueling the debate on Facebook and other social media sites — it`s more of these types of legal but horrible content.» The work that has already been done in Congress and through legislation in California, Colorado and Virginia has laid the groundwork for federal legislation. Industry and privacy, consumer protection, and civil liberties advocates are willing to compromise on key issues if and when Congress prepares to pass a privacy bill. On Capitol Hill, the idea of removing or updating Section 230, which could expose tech platforms to more prosecutions for hate speech and misinformation, has grown. Among the proposed changes is the liability of platforms for hosting child sexual abuse content.

President Biden has also suggested that platforms should be held accountable for hosting vaccine-related misinformation. (Social media companies and industry organizations lobbied hard against the section 230 amendments.) We have done nothing to update our data protection laws in this country, our federal data protection laws. Nothing. Zilch,» Minnesota Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar said at the Haugen hearing. But there is one major obstacle to this approach, experts say: the First Amendment. Even if lawmakers were to get rid of Section 230 and Meta faced lawsuits, for example, for misinformation on its platforms, this speech is protected by the First Amendment. That means the company would likely win eventually, according to Jeff Kosseff, a cybersecurity law professor at the U.S. Naval Academy and author of a book on Section 230 titled «The Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet.» In addition, we are updating our Terms of Use to better explain what is expected of us and those who use our Platforms.

These expectations include the rights and obligations described in our Community Standards, such as when we may disable or terminate accounts that violate our Terms or Community Standards, or the intellectual property rights of others, or other laws. Some changes to the Terms of Service will be consistent with updates to our Privacy Policy, including additional details about what happens when you remove Content. This shifts responsibility «to users and regulators – `users, it`s your decision to participate in this transaction,`» she told the BBC. «And regulators, the ball is in your court to enforce the laws in your jurisdiction.» And last week, a federal judge said the Federal Trade Commission could move forward with a lawsuit to break Meta after the company argued the complaint should be dismissed. (The case could drag on for years.) The FTC and several attorneys general are also reportedly investigating Meta`s Oculus virtual reality unit on antitrust grounds, according to a Bloomberg report Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. According to the social media giant itself, about 3 billion people use Facebook`s platforms, including Facebook, Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp. In other words, where Facebook goes, its other platforms like Insta and WhatsApp are sure to follow. CNN`s Brian Fung contributed to this report. Haugen, meanwhile, encouraged reforming Section 230 to hold platforms accountable for how their algorithms promote content. In this scenario, Meta and other tech companies would still not be responsible for user-generated content, but could be held liable for how their algorithms promote that content and make it viral. This volume will soon explode even more as data-intensive technologies power augmented and virtual reality environments (the «metaverse» referred to by Facebook`s new name) and autonomous vehicles on the roads communicate with sensors that monitor traffic and pedestrian safety.

«Facebook is now Meta,» reads a disclaimer at the top of the company`s terms of service page. «As our company name changes, we continue to offer the same products, including Meta`s Facebook app. Our data policy and terms of use will remain in effect, and this name change will not affect how we use or share information. «They see a lot less politicized commentary and a lot more focus and coordination on these issues, the underlying technology and the business model,» Paul said. Director of the tech advocacy group Tech Transparency Project. «It`s clear that many of these members of Congress have done their homework and understand what they`re seeing.» So here are 5 NEW Facebook policies you`d better follow today! Despite agreeing that something should be done to remedy Big Tech`s — and especially meta — dominance — Democrats and Republicans are divided on what the central issue really is. Republicans accuse Facebook of anti-conservative bias despite the lack of evidence, while Democrats worry the company isn`t doing enough to protect itself from hate speech, misinformation and other problematic content. This is a significant change for those who use Facebook`s Power Editor. If you`re not ready to remove the social network, I`ll give you some recommendations on how to protect your privacy and limit your use of Facebook. If you have an iPhone, you can use app tracking transparency to prevent Facebook from tracking you across other apps and websites. Better yet, you can remove the app from your phone to limit the data Facebook can collect and use it only in your computer`s browser.

Facebook announced in late 2020 that «some partners» could claim ownership of their images and then moderate their use on Facebook`s platforms. Right now, this implementation could affect newly published content on Facebook and Instagram in a variety of ways. An image owner`s current options when detecting unauthorized use include: The Facebook Privacy Update, which affects Facebook, Instagram, and Facebook Messenger but not WhatsApp, also offers more control over the audience that sees your posts. In the meantime, Facebook has added a unique control that allows you to set your ad theme preferences.